Thermodynamic and technoeconomic comparative justification of a waste heat recovery process with integration of multifluid and indirect evaporative cooler

For a well-developed, efficient and feasible system, it is necessary to produce power generation enormously with reduction in harmful emissions like Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), monoxide (CO), Nitrogen (N), oxide (NOx), Sulphur (SO ). Waste heat gases emit directly into an environment, has many adverse effects on the environment including global warming, environmental pollution, effect human health as well. Researchers believe that thermally system could be achieved by converting waste net output. From this efficiency obtained 5% 8% unable meet space cost demands of recovery (WHR) system. recovery, most typical cycles used for are Rankine cycle Brayton cycle. Even though these best but their not such maximum. By observing all aspects, there different way recovering indirect evaporative cooler (IDE). An beneficial terms enormous generation, getting maximum efficiency, low operating cost, acquiring sustainable The focus current research was recover industrial exhausted from SP boilers cement industry. ASPEN HYSYS software generating model further operates Maisotsenko (M cycle). topping bottoming model. Both working fluid air binary mixture CO -C 7 H 8 operated manipulating air, generated output 68.53 MW 35.44% thermal efficiency. Integrating permits 48.59 38.57% value. Comparison analysis performed extracting optimal parameters extreme greatest Bestway industry developed present 38.04 30.63 27.78% 27.77% executing both fluids mixture. A techno-economic (TEA) entire which exhibits $30/MWh along 3 years payback period.